Ivan Loh, A Fuji X-photographer is known for his quirky and different approach through his lens. He has received numerous accolades from the International Photography Award, New York and Photography Master Cup. Most Recently a Gold, 1st Place at the 2014 PX3 Prix De La Photographie in Paris .
Ivan started shooting since his teenage years with his father’s Nikon SLR and he hasn’t stopped since. He has lensed campaigns for clients such as Singapore Airlines, MTV Asia, Nike, Bossini, Nanyang Technological University(NTU) Tuas Power, Allianz Insurance, Manulife Insurance, HSBC Insurance, DHL. TNT, UOB, CAAS, Hilton Group, Intercontinental Hotel Group, Raffles Hotel, Diegeo, Embraer, Carlson, TATA Communication, HDB, Clark Quay, HOT FM 91.3, Kiss 92FM, JIA 88.3, Power 98, and CHIMJES.
His editorial works have appeared in magazines such as Conde Nast, Home+Living, TopGear Singapore, Her World, Cleo, Seventeen, FHM, Parents World and Home & Decor. His works have also glossed the pages of international magazines such as Asian Photography and Digital Photography(UK).
View all posts by ivanjoshualoh
3 Comments
Such a steange conclusion and wish to go for megapixels instead to do it as photographer who knows that you can stitch multiple images to meet any stupid requirements from the agencies which know even less.
This comment is really about the agency and it’s inane requirements, not about you. A 50 mgp sensor doesn’t provide an image sufficient for a bus poster? Early in the 2000s a pharmaceutical client of mine used one of my images shot with an Olympus E1 – 5 mgp sensor – to produce a 4’x9’ poster placed above a booth at a medical meeting. And it looked great. I guarantee you that the same agency that now says 50 mgp isn’t sufficient used to think 2 1/4 film was great, and 12 mgp digital images were awesome. We’re talking about an image that’s going on a BUS – a moving object that’s anywhere from 6’ to a block from viewers – and 50 mgp isn’t sufficient? That is utterly ridiculous, one of the best examples of ‘mine’s bigger than yours’ mentality I’ve ever heard of.
Such a steange conclusion and wish to go for megapixels instead to do it as photographer who knows that you can stitch multiple images to meet any stupid requirements from the agencies which know even less.
This comment is really about the agency and it’s inane requirements, not about you. A 50 mgp sensor doesn’t provide an image sufficient for a bus poster? Early in the 2000s a pharmaceutical client of mine used one of my images shot with an Olympus E1 – 5 mgp sensor – to produce a 4’x9’ poster placed above a booth at a medical meeting. And it looked great. I guarantee you that the same agency that now says 50 mgp isn’t sufficient used to think 2 1/4 film was great, and 12 mgp digital images were awesome. We’re talking about an image that’s going on a BUS – a moving object that’s anywhere from 6’ to a block from viewers – and 50 mgp isn’t sufficient? That is utterly ridiculous, one of the best examples of ‘mine’s bigger than yours’ mentality I’ve ever heard of.
Did you try uprezzing your GFX files? You might have been able to get them up to the requirement without sacrificing IQ.